link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Prowse Chowne LLP

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 627
Case name: Society Promoting Environmental Conservation v. Canada (Attorney General)
Date: 2003-05-29
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: Federal Court - Appeal Division
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Canada (Attorney General)   Appellant
  Society Promoting Environmental Conservation   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Evans, John Maxwell J.A.
  Malone, J. Brian D. J.A.
  Strayer, Barry Lee J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Hunter, John J.L.   Appellant
  Stephens, K. Michael   Appellant
  Gage, Andrew B.   Respondent
  Wright, David   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by Canada from a lower court decision quashing an expropriation order made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-21. The expropriation order related to an attempt by Canada to expropriate a parcel of land located at Nanoose Bay British Columbia for national defence purposes. In the lower court judicial review proceeding, the applicant society had alleged certain procedural errors during the expropriation inquiry procedure. On appeal it was held that the procedural errors were not sufficient to justify setting aside the expropriation order. The appeal was allowed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2003] EXLAW 320
Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 239
Parallel citations: (2003) 123 ACWS (3d) 307
  (2003) 4 ADMIN LR (4th) 223
  2003 CarswellNat 1559
  2003 CarswellNat 2653
  (2003) 228 DLR (4th) 693
  [2003] 4 FC 959
  [2003] FCJ No. 861
  (2003) 242 FTR 159
  (2003) 80 LCR 1
  (2003) 305 NR 203
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1999] EXLAW 313 F.C. T.D. 1999-09-02
  [1999] EXLAW 309 B.C. S.C. 1999-09-21
  [2000] EXLAW 338 F.C. T.D. 2000-05-26
  [2001] EXLAW 343 F.C. T.D. 2001-02-13
  [2002] EXLAW 303 F.C. T.D. 2002-03-05
  [2002] EXLAW 317 F.C. A.D. 2002-05-13
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024