link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 323
Case name: Human Rights Institute of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services)
Date: 1999-09-02
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: Federal Court - Trial Division
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Citizens Concerned About Free Trade   Applicant
  Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee, The   Applicant
  Fogal, Constance Clara   Applicant
  Human Rights Institute of Canada, The   Applicant
  Larson, Rosemary   Applicant
  Puhalo, Lazar   Applicant
  Canada (Attorney General)   Respondent
  Canada (Minister of Defence)   Respondent
  Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services)   Respondent
  Canada (Prime Minister and other members of Cabinet)   Respondent
  Clinton, William J.   Respondent
  Goldie, Michael   Respondent
  United States of America   Respondent
  United States of America (Armed Forces)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Reed, Barbara J. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Galati, Rocco   Applicant
  Cowper, D. Geoffrey   Respondent
  Hunter, John J.L.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application for several interim injunctions intended to prevent Canada from completing an expropriation, pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-21, of land owned by the Province of British Columbia pending the hearing of a constitutional challenge to the expropriation. The intended expropriation was for the purpose of an underwater torpedo testing range. The first application was for an injunction to prevent the inquiry officer from delivering his report to the expropriating authority. The second was to prevent the expropriating authority from confirming the expropriation upon receipt of the inquiry officer's report. The third was to prevent Canada from entering into any leasing agreements with the United States respecting the use of the torpedo testing range. The application was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1999] EXLAW 313
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations: (1999) 91 ACWS (3d) 1023
  1999 CanLII 9377
  1999 CarswellNat 1766
  1999 CarswellNat 3009
  [1999] FCJ No. 1404
  (1999) 176 FTR 225
  (1999) 68 LCR 81
  [2000] 1 FC 475
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1999] EXLAW 309 B.C. S.C. 1999-09-21
  [2000] EXLAW 338 F.C. T.D. 2000-05-26
  [2001] EXLAW 343 F.C. T.D. 2001-02-13
  [2002] EXLAW 303 F.C. T.D. 2002-03-05
  [2002] EXLAW 317 F.C. A.D. 2002-05-13
  [2003] EXLAW 320 F.C. A.D. 2003-05-29
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024