link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 469
Case name: Society Promoting Environmental Conservation v. Canada (Attorney General)
Date: 2002-03-05
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: Federal Court - Trial Division
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Society Promoting Environmental Conservation   Applicant
  Canada (Attorney General)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Campbell, Douglas R. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Gage, Andrew B.   Applicant
  Wright, David   Applicant
  Hunter, John J.L.   Respondent
  Stephens, K. Michael   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by a third party intervenor to set aside a federal expropriation of land owned by the Province of British Columbia. At issue was whether the procedural and substantive requirements of the federal Expropriation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-21 had been complied with during the inquiry phase. The court found that the Hearing Officer did not meet certain mandatory requirements. The expropriation was set aside.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2002] EXLAW 303
Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 236
Parallel citations: (2002) 112 ACWS (3d) 885
  2002 CarswellNat 597
  2002 CarswellNat 2766
  (2002) 46 CELR (NS) 119
  [2002] FCJ No. 258
  (2002) 217 FTR 279
  (2002) 77 LCR 85
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1999] EXLAW 313 F.C. T.D. 1999-09-02
  [1999] EXLAW 309 B.C. S.C. 1999-09-21
  [2000] EXLAW 338 F.C. T.D. 2000-05-26
  [2001] EXLAW 343 F.C. T.D. 2001-02-13
  Later
  [2002] EXLAW 317 F.C. A.D. 2002-05-13
  [2003] EXLAW 320 F.C. A.D. 2003-05-29
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024