link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Heritage Coffee Company Ltd.

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 485
Case name: Human Rights Institute of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services)
Date: 2001-02-13
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: Federal Court - Trial Division
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Citizens Concerned About Free Trade   Applicant
  Defence of Canadian Liberty Committee, The   Applicant
  Fogal, Constance Clara   Applicant
  Human Rights Institute of Canada, The   Applicant
  Larson, Rosemary   Applicant
  Puhalo, Lazar   Applicant
  Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services)   Authority
  Canada (Attorney General)   Respondent
  Canada (Minister of Defence)   Respondent
  Canada (Prime Minister and other members of Cabinet)   Respondent
  Clinton, William J.   Respondent
  Goldie, Michael   Respondent
  United States of America   Respondent
  United States of America (Armed Forces)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Hargrave, John A. Prothonotary
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Azevedo, Manuel A.   Applicant
  Galati, Rocco   Applicant
  Rankin, Harry   Applicant
  Calder, Gillian M.   Respondent
  Hunter, John J.L.   Respondent
  Stephens, K. Michael   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application for production of documents for use in a judicial review proceeding. The order under review was a decision of the Minister to approve an expropriation pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-21. The application was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2001] EXLAW 343
Neutral citation: 2001 FCT 71
Parallel citations: (2001) 104 ACWS (3d) 641
  2001 CarswellNat 543
  2001 CarswellNat 5477
  [2001] FCJ No. 401
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1999] EXLAW 313 F.C. T.D. 1999-09-02
  [1999] EXLAW 309 B.C. S.C. 1999-09-21
  [2000] EXLAW 338 F.C. T.D. 2000-05-26
  Later
  [2002] EXLAW 303 F.C. T.D. 2002-03-05
  [2002] EXLAW 317 F.C. A.D. 2002-05-13
  [2003] EXLAW 320 F.C. A.D. 2003-05-29
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024