link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 372
Case name: Sequoia Springs West Development Corp. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 2000-08-24
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Sequoia Springs West Development Corporation   Appellant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Rowles, Mildred Anne J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Hanman, Charles Edward   Appellant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the owner for leave to appeal a compensation award made by the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board following an expropriation conducted pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. Leave was granted.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2000] EXLAW 325
Neutral citation: 2000 BCCA 482
Parallel citations: (2000) 98 ACWS (3d) 1224
  (2000) 141 BCAC 303
  [2000] BCJ No. 1726
  2000 CarswellBC 1713
  (2000) 46 CPC (4th) 71
  (2000) 71 LCR 97
  (2000) 231 WAC 303
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2000] EXLAW 301 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-02-15
  Later
  [2000] EXLAW 324 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-09-01
  [2001] EXLAW 304 B.C. E.C.B. 2001-01-26
  [2003] EXLAW 300 B.C. C.A. 2003-01-03
  [2006] EXLAW 305 B.C. E.C.B. 2006-03-20
  [2006] EXLAW 315 B.C. C.A. 2006-09-27
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024