link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 505
Case name: Sequoia Springs West Development Corp. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 2003-01-03
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Sequoia Springs West Development Corporation   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Authority
Decision makers: Name Designation
Donald, Ian T. J.A.
  Esson, William A. J.A.
  Saunders, Mary E. J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Alexander, L. John   Claimant
  Hanman, Charles Edward   Claimant
  Crowhurst, Frances   Authority
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Authority
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the Claimant and cross-appeal by the Authority from compensation and cost awards made by the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. The compensation award was made in respect of the taking for highway purposes of a 29 ac. portion from a 234 ac. property located near Campbell River. At issue on the appeal was the Board's findings on market value of the land taken, reduction in market value to the remainder, disturbance damages and its treatment of a Calderbank letter in relation to the cost award. The appeal was allowed to the extent only of remitting a disturbance damage claim for costs thrown away to the Board for reconsideration.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2003] EXLAW 300
Neutral citation: 2003 BCCA 8
Parallel citations: (2003) 118 ACWS (3d) 832
  (2003) 176 BCAC 124
  [2003] BCJ No. 9
  (2003) 10 BCLR (4th) 278
  (2003) 78 LCR 1
  (2003) 6 RPR (4th) 58
  (2003) 290 WAC 124
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2000] EXLAW 301 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-02-15
  [2000] EXLAW 325 B.C. C.A. 2000-08-24
  [2000] EXLAW 324 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-09-01
  Later
  [2006] EXLAW 305 B.C. E.C.B. 2006-03-20
  [2006] EXLAW 315 B.C. C.A. 2006-09-27
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024