link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Cohen Highley LLP

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 421
Case name: Sequoia Springs West Development Corp. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 2001-01-26
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Sequoia Springs West Development Corporation   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Authority
Decision makers: Name Designation
Eames, Lesley Member
  Greenwood, Julian K. Member
  Walls, Sharon I. Vice-Chair
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Hanman, Charles Edward   Claimant
  Crowhurst, Frances   Authority
  Parker, Catherine J.   Other
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Authority to re-open a compensation hearing. The Expropriation Compensation Board had previously made an award of compensation following a hearing under the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. At that time the Board found that the Claimant was entitled as of right to recover its costs because it had received more than 115% of the advance payment. However, on the further application, the Authority established that the advance payment was actually greater than assumed by the Board due to a mistake made by the Authority at the original hearing. The Board therefore had a discretion to decide whether the Claimant was entitled to recover its costs. The Authority then asked the Board to deny costs to the Claimant. However, the Board refused and held that the Claimant was still entitled to recover its costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2001] EXLAW 304
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations: (2001) 71 LCR 315
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2000] EXLAW 301 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-02-15
  [2000] EXLAW 325 B.C. C.A. 2000-08-24
  [2000] EXLAW 324 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-09-01
  Later
  [2006] EXLAW 305 B.C. E.C.B. 2006-03-20
  [2006] EXLAW 315 B.C. C.A. 2006-09-27
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024