| Case name: |
Tessier v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Inquiry proceeding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Tessier, Guy H. |
|
Objector |
| |
Tessier, Vanna M. |
|
Objector |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Nielsen, Rex M. |
Inquiry Officer |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Jantz, Susan |
|
Objector |
| |
Debrinski, Douglas Steven |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Norton, Darrell |
Engineer |
Objector |
| |
Caithness, Shawn M. |
Appraiser |
Authority |
| |
Ellsworth, Shawn G. |
Engineer |
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Report of an inquiry officer appointed pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. E-13. The expropriating authority proposed to acquire land owned by the Objectors for a highway interchange project. The inquiry officer found that the proposed expropriation was fair, sound and reasonably necessary. Costs were awarded to the Objectors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2005] EXLAW 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
