| Case name: |
Tessier v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Land Compensation Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Tessier, Guy H. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Tessier, Vanna M. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Respondent |
| |
Mallon, Donald P. |
|
Other |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Mah, John C. |
Member |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Hajduk, Richard B. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Renouf, Simon Mollett |
|
Claimant |
| |
Hughes, Sarah Dorothy |
|
Respondent |
| |
Olinyk, Walter A. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Teeling, Michael D. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Shores, William W. |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by the Respondent expropriating authority to the Alberta Land Compensation Board for an order determining that a settlement agreement existed between the parties. The Respondent expropriated land from the Claimants on February 15, 2005 pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. E-13. During the compensation hearing a dispute arose as to whether a settlement agreement had been reached between the parties. The compensation hearing adjourned at that point. Subsequently the Board held that it had jurisdiction to determine whether a settlement agreement existed. The present hearing was conducted to determine the merits of this issue. The Board found that a settlement had been reached. The application was granted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutral citation: |
2012 ABLCB 11 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2012] EXLAW 21 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
2012 CarswellAlta 2400 |
| |
(2012) 110 L.C.R. 167 |
| |
2012 LNALCB 11 |
|
|
|
