| Case name: |
Tessier v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
| Court: |
Land Compensation Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Tessier, Guy H. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Tessier, Vanna M. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Chapman, E. Gordon |
Member |
| |
Fraser, Karen R. |
Member |
| |
Sibbald, Donald A. |
Member |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Hajduk, Richard B. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Piecowye, Debi L. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Teeling, Michael D. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Joint application by both parties to the Alberta Land Compensation Board for a determination as to whether a compensation hearing pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. E-13, should be adjourned. At the time this application was heard the compensation hearing had commenced. After proceeding with the hearing for five days the panel was informed that a dispute had arisen between the parties as to whether a settlement had been reached. New counsel for the Claimant appeared and the Board was asked to determine whether it had jurisdiction to determine if a settlement had been achieved. It was held that the present panel of the Board would not decide this issue and the compensation hearing should reconvene on a date to be determined by the Board Administration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2010] EXLAW 20 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
2010 Can LII 98395 |
|
|
|
