link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1119
Case name: Pay Less Gas Co. (1972) Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 2006-09-22
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Pay Less Gas Co. (1972) Ltd.   Plaintiff
  Shell Canada Products Limited   Plaintiff
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Defendant
Decision makers: Name Designation
Bolton, Neil Master
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Dley, S. Dev   Plaintiff
  Crowhurst, Frances   Defendant
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Hooge, Ronald J. Valuator Plaintiff
  Spence, Donald M. Valuator Plaintiff
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by two Plaintiffs for a final review of costs pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125, s. 45. The costs claimed arose from three separate expropriations in 1990. A land compensation award had been made in one case and claims for land compensation in the other two cases had been settled without a hearing. The subject properties were located in Mill Bay and the land was taken for the purpose of widening the Trans-Canada Highway. Upon the close of the Plaintiffs' case at the cost review hearing, the aggregate amount claimed for costs was $694,586. The aggregate advance payment paid by the Defendant towards the Plaintiffs' costs was $173,316. After numerous adjustments to the amounts claimed for professional costs incurred by the Claimants, a final cost award was made. However, the amount of the award was left for calculation by the parties using the guidelines set out in the decision.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2006] EXLAW 316
Neutral citation: 2006 BCSC 1431
Parallel citations: (2006) 152 ACWS (3d) 650
  [2006] BCJ No. 2145
  (2006) 90 LCR 192
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2001] EXLAW 331 B.C. E.C.B. 2001-09-21
  [2002] EXLAW 315 B.C. E.C.B. 2002-06-20
  [2003] EXLAW 330 B.C. E.C.B. 2003-12-11
  Later
  [2007] EXLAW 311 B.C. S.C. 2007-09-17
  [2007] EXLAW 313 B.C. S.C. 2007-12-06
  [2008] EXLAW 303 B.C. S.C. 2008-05-02
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024