| Case name: |
Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Vancouver (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Vancouver (City) |
|
Appellant |
| |
Canadian Pacific Railway Company |
|
Respondent |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Donald, Ian T. |
J.A. |
| |
Esson, William A. |
J.A. |
| |
Southin, Mary Frances |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Horne, Susan B. |
|
Appellant |
| |
Macintosh, George K. |
|
Appellant |
| |
Kenward, Peter H. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal by the City of Vancouver from a decision setting aside the City's Arbutus Corridor Official Development Plan Bylaw. The Bylaw had restricted the permitted uses for the Respondent's land and prevented redevelopment. The appeal was allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2004] EXLAW 304 |
|
| Neutral citation: |
2004 BCCA 192 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2004) 129 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1214 |
| |
(2004) 14 Admin. L.R. (4th) 60 |
| |
(2004) 196 B.C.A.C. 49 |
| |
[2004] B.C.J. No. 653 |
| |
(2004) 26 B.C.L.R. (4th) 220 |
| |
(2004) 237 D.L.R. (4th) 40 |
| |
(2004) 81 L.C.R. 241 |
| |
(2004) 45 M.P.L.R. (3d) 161 |
| |
(2004) 40 R.P.R. (4th) 201 |
| |
(2004) 322 W.A.C. 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
