link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 707
Case name: Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Vancouver (City)
Date: 2004-04-07
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Vancouver (City)   Appellant
  Canadian Pacific Railway Company   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Donald, Ian T. J.A.
  Esson, William A. J.A.
  Southin, Mary Frances J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Horne, Susan B.   Appellant
  Macintosh, George K.   Appellant
  Kenward, Peter H.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the City of Vancouver from a decision setting aside the City's Arbutus Corridor Official Development Plan Bylaw. The Bylaw had restricted the permitted uses for the Respondent's land and prevented redevelopment. The appeal was allowed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2004] EXLAW 304
Neutral citation: 2004 BCCA 192
Parallel citations: (2004) 129 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1214
  (2004) 14 Admin. L.R. (4th) 60
  (2004) 196 B.C.A.C. 49
  [2004] B.C.J. No. 653
  (2004) 26 B.C.L.R. (4th) 220
  (2004) 237 D.L.R. (4th) 40
  (2004) 81 L.C.R. 241
  (2004) 45 M.P.L.R. (3d) 161
  (2004) 40 R.P.R. (4th) 201
  (2004) 322 W.A.C. 49
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2002] EXLAW 327 B.C. S.C. 2002-10-29
  [2003] EXLAW 331 B.C. C.A. 2003-08-22
  Later
  [2004] EXLAW 20 S.C.C. 2004-12-16
  [2006] EXLAW 301 S.C.C. 2006-02-23
  [2015] EXLAW 1 B.C. S.C. 2015-01-20
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: September 7, 2024