link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1883
Case name: Vancouver (City) v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
Date: 2015-01-20
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Vancouver (City)   Plaintiff
  Canada (Attorney General)   Defendant
  Canadian Pacific Railway Company   Defendant
Decision makers: Name Designation
Hinkson, Christopher E. C.J.S.C.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Arvay, Joseph J.   Plaintiff
  Dickson, Timothy A.   Plaintiff
  Herbst, Ludmila B.   Plaintiff
  Miller, Erica C.L.   Plaintiff
  Andrews, Mark D.   Defendant
  Coval, Simon R.   Defendant
  Hsia, Stephen M.Y.   Defendant
  Laird, Lisa K.   Defendant
  Nakanishi, Kevin   Defendant
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the City of Vancouver for injunctions to prohibit the Defendant Railway from clearing land owned by the Railway to permit resumption of rail service and from undertaking any construction activities or operation of the railway on the land before obtaining the statutory approvals required for such activities. The application was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [2015] EXLAW 1
Neutral citation: 2015 BCSC 76
Parallel citations: [2015] BCJ No. 79
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2002] EXLAW 327 B.C. S.C. 2002-10-29
  [2003] EXLAW 331 B.C. C.A. 2003-08-22
  [2004] EXLAW 304 B.C. C.A. 2004-04-07
  [2004] EXLAW 20 S.C.C. 2004-12-16
  [2006] EXLAW 301 S.C.C. 2006-02-23
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024