link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 67
Case name: Bill's Frontier Restaurant Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1994-08-18
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Bill's Frontier Restaurant Ltd.   Claimant
  Giannikos, Panayota   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Clark, David J. Member
  Coates, John A. Member
  Harvey, Jeanne Chair
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Shuchat, Arnold E.   Claimant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Selman, Donald Valuator Claimant
  Symes, Toby McLean Valuator Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimants to the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board for determination of compensation pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. Partial taking of a fee simple area and construction working space rights from two adjacent properties for a highway widening project. One of the subject parcels was developed with a restaurant operated by the corporate Claimant. Claims were advanced for market value of the land taken, reduction in market value to the remaining land and disturbance damages. The first two claims were settled prior to the hearing in the aggregate amount of $190,000.00. The Board awarded disturbance damages for business losses in the amount of $105,000. Additional disturbance damages in the amount of $19,705 were awarded for certain expenses incurred by the Claimants in response to the taking. Disturbance damages were also awarded for the cost of repairing the roof of the restaurant which was damaged during highway construction. A claim for executive time was denied. The total award was $330,455 plus costs and interest.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1992] EXLAW 32 B.C. E.C.B. 1992-05-08
  Later
  [1996] EXLAW 159 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-02-29
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1994] EXLAW 67
Parallel citations: (1994) 53 L.C.R. 175
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024