link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 32
Case name: Bill's Frontier Restaurant Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 1992-05-08
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Bill's Frontier Restaurant Ltd.   Claimant
  Giannikos, Panayota   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Clark, David J. Member
  Coates, John A. Member
  Heinrich, John H. Chairman
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Cram, Jack N.   Claimant
  Hood, D. Roderick   Claimant
  Reder, Brenda M.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Respondent to the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board for an order dismissing the compensation claims advanced by the Claimants pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. In the alternative, the Respondent applied for certain orders to compel further and better discovery of the Claimants' case. The Respondent also applied for an adjournment of the compensation hearing and an order imposing an interest penalty on the Claimants for delay. Partial taking from two properties for a highway widening project. One of the subject properties was developed with a restaurant. The Board found that the Claimants had unreasonably delayed in responding to the Respondent's discovery requests. It ordered production of a list of documents and an affidavit. It further ordered that the Claimants be deprived of interest during a specified delay period. The Claimants were also denied their costs of this application.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1994] EXLAW 67 B.C. E.C.B. 1994-08-18
  [1996] EXLAW 159 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-02-29
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1992] EXLAW 32
Parallel citations: (1992) 47 L.C.R. 90
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024