| Case name: |
Ingham v. Creston (Town) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Ingham, Albert Cecil |
|
Claimant |
| |
Ingham, Lillian Rose |
|
Claimant |
| |
Jamieson, Frank Herbert |
|
Claimant |
| |
Jamieson, Mildred Johanna |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Helen |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Russel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Samuel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Creston (Town) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Title |
|
Blair, Richard M.L. |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Burke, Reinhard |
|
Claimant |
| |
Melville, J. Bruce |
|
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal of three final cost awards made earlier pursuant to s.45 of the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. One issue was whether the Board was correct in making a downwards adjustment to legal costs to reflect the small net compensation awards. The court found that the Act did not permit this type of adjustment. The balance of the appeal was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
[1992] EXLAW 300 |
B.C. S.C. |
1992-09-25 |
| |
[1993] EXLAW 123 |
B.C. C.A. |
1993-12-13 |
| |
[1996] EXLAW 171 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
1996-06-25 |
| |
[1999] EXLAW 295 |
B.C. C.A. |
1999-03-22 |
| |
[1999] EXLAW 299 |
B.C. C.A. |
1999-05-12 |
| |
[1999] EXLAW 302 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
1999-06-02 |
| |
[2000] EXLAW 313 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
2000-05-16 |
| |
[2000] EXLAW 323 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
2000-07-28 |
| |
Later |
| |
[2001] EXLAW 312 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
2001-03-21 |
| |
[2001] EXLAW 324 |
B.C. E.C.B. |
2001-06-19 |
|
| Neutral citation: |
2001 BCSC 351 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2001] EXLAW 310 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2001) 103 A.C.W.S. (3d) 749 |
| |
[2001] B.C.J. No. 433 |
| |
(2001) 73 L.C.R. 122 |
|
|
|
