| Case name: |
Ingham v. Creston (Town) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
| Court: |
Expropriation Compensation Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Ingham, Albert Cecil |
|
Claimant |
| |
Ingham, Lillian Rose |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Helen |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Russel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Samuel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Creston (Town) |
|
Authority |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Eames, Lesley |
Member |
| |
Greenwood, Julian K. |
Member |
| |
Grover, Michael R. |
Member |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Burke, Reinhard |
|
Claimant |
| |
Melville, J. Bruce |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Grant, Danny R. |
Appraiser |
Claimant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Reconsideration by the Expropriation Compensation Board of a previous compensation award made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. The reconsideration had been directed by a decision of the appeal court. The reconsideration related to the Board's award for injurious affection on two residential properties affected by a street widening. The Board rejected the cost approach and assessed injurious affection on the basis of 15% of the depreciated building values. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2000] EXLAW 323 |
|
|
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2000) 70 LCR 126 |
|
|
|
|
|
