Expropriation Law Centre

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 369
Case name: Ingham v. Creston (Town)
Date: 2000-07-28
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Registry: [Subscribers only]
File: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Ingham, Albert Cecil   Claimant
  Ingham, Lillian Rose   Claimant
  Kowalski, Helen   Claimant
  Kowalski, Russel   Claimant
  Kowalski, Samuel   Claimant
  Creston (Town)   Authority
Before: Decision maker Title
Eames, Lesley Member
  Greenwood, Julian K. Member
  Grover, Michael R. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Burke, Reinhard   Claimant
  Melville, J. Bruce   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Grant, Danny R. Appraiser Claimant
Taking type/date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Reconsideration by the Expropriation Compensation Board of a previous compensation award made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. The reconsideration had been directed by a decision of the appeal court. The reconsideration related to the Board's award for injurious affection on two residential properties affected by a street widening. The Board rejected the cost approach and assessed injurious affection on the basis of 15% of the depreciated building values.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1992] EXLAW 300 B.C. S.C. 1992-09-25
  [1993] EXLAW 123 B.C. C.A. 1993-12-13
  [1996] EXLAW 171 B.C. E.C.B. 1996-06-25
  [1999] EXLAW 295 B.C. C.A. 1999-03-22
  [1999] EXLAW 299 B.C. C.A. 1999-05-12
  [1999] EXLAW 302 B.C. E.C.B. 1999-06-02
  [2000] EXLAW 313 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-05-16
  Later
  [2001] EXLAW 310 B.C. S.C. 2001-03-06
  [2001] EXLAW 312 B.C. E.C.B. 2001-03-21
  [2001] EXLAW 324 B.C. E.C.B. 2001-06-19
Neutral citation:  
ExLaw citation: [2000] EXLAW 323
Parallel citations: (2000) 70 L.C.R. 126
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement

© 2020 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: August 5, 2019