| Case name: |
Ingham v. Creston (Town) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Ingham, Albert Cecil |
|
Appellant |
| |
Ingham, Lillian Rose |
|
Appellant |
| |
Kowalski, Helen |
|
Appellant |
| |
Kowalski, Russel |
|
Appellant |
| |
Kowalski, Samuel |
|
Appellant |
| |
Creston (Town) |
|
Respondent |
| |
Jamieson, Frank Herbert |
|
Respondent |
| |
Jamieson, Mildred Johanna |
|
Respondent |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Esson, William A. |
J.A. |
| |
McEachern, Allan |
C.J.B.C. |
| |
Rowles, Mildred Anne |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Burke, Reinhard |
|
Appellant |
| |
Melville, J. Bruce |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Supplemental reasons on the disposition of an appeal of a compensation award. The original award had been made by the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. The Appellant owners had earlier been successful in overturning the Board's award when the Court of Appeal offered the parties a chance to agree on the appropriate compensation award to be substituted. However, the parties were not able to reach this agreement so the Court ordered that the matter be sent back to the Board for reconsideration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1999] EXLAW 299 |
|
| Neutral citation: |
1999 BCCA 316 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1999) 88 ACWS (3d) 113 |
| |
[1999] BCJ No. 1111 |
|
|
|
|
|
