link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Access Property Services

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 722
Case name: Mannix v. Alberta (Minister of Environment)
Date: 1984-12-12
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Mannix, Frederick Charles   Appellant
  Alberta (Minister of Environment)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Haddad, William Joseph J.A.
  Lieberman, Samuel Sereth J.A.
  Stevenson, William Alexander J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Samuelson, D.G.   Appellant
  Tavender, E. David D.   Appellant
  Mason, D. Blair   Respondent
  Prentice, Peter Eric James   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by an owner from a compensation award for the partial taking of a parcel of land approximately 300 ac. in area for Fish Creek Provincial Park. The expropriation had been conducted pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.A. 1974, c. 27. At the conclusion of the appeal hearing, the Appellant's appeal of the award of $6,183,300 for market value of the land taken was dismissed and the court's decision on the remaining issues was reserved.

In the present appeal decision, the award of interest was increased. An allowance of $618,300 for disturbance damages for unusual circumstances was held to have been wrongly awarded but was nevertheless allowed to stand due to the failure of the trial court to award compensation for loss of the Appellant's residence. Costs were awarded to the Appellant on a party and party basis.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1984] EXLAW 1
Neutral citation: 1984 ABCA 348
Parallel citations: (1984) 29 A.C.W.S. (2d) 14
  [1984] A.J. No. 722
  (1984) 56 A.R. 221
  (1984) 35 Alta. L.R. (2d) 289
  (1984) 31 L.C.R. 305
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1981] EXLAW 1 Alta. Q.B. 1981-01-16
  [1981] EXLAW 2 Alta. C.A. 1981-07-10
  [1983] EXLAW 3 Alta. Q.B. 1983-02-22
  [1984] EXLAW 2 Alta. C.A. 1984-10-24
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: September 7, 2024