| Case name: |
Fontana v. Oxford (County) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Ontario |
|
| Court: |
Local Planning Appeal Tribunal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Blandford Square Developments Limited |
|
Claimant |
| |
Calvano, Antonio |
|
Claimant |
| |
Chetti, Joseph |
|
Claimant |
| |
Fontana, Luigi |
|
Claimant |
| |
Marignani, Guiseppe |
|
Claimant |
| |
Mintz, Irwin |
|
Claimant |
| |
Rui, Mirto |
|
Claimant |
| |
Vincorp Financial Limited |
|
Claimant |
| |
Oxford (County) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Lanthier, David L. |
Member |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Ackerman, Robert Giles |
|
Claimant |
| |
Baker, Andrew Michael |
|
Respondent |
| |
Lesage, Julie Marianne |
|
Respondent |
| |
Waque, Stephen F. |
|
Respondent |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Lansink, Ben |
Appraiser |
Claimant |
| |
Spears, Catherine |
Planner |
Claimant |
| |
Tilley, Ian |
Economist |
Claimant |
| |
Atlin, David |
Appraiser |
Respondent |
| |
Whyte, Yvonne |
Appraiser |
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Procedural ruling during a compensation hearing conducted by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26. The Respondent had objected to allowing two expert witnesses to be in attendance while the panel was hearing oral evidence from each witness's co-author. It was held that no prejudice would arise to any party by allowing these experts to be present while the co-author gave evidence. The application was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2019] EXLAW 26 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
2019 CarswellOnt 24339 |
| |
(2019) 16 L.C.R. (2d) 143 |
|
|
|
