link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1269
Case name: Blandford Square Developments Ltd. v. Oxford (County)
Date: 2009-01-20
Jurisdiction: Canada - Ontario
Court: Superior Court of Justice
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Blandford Square Developments Limited   Plaintiff
  Oxford (County)   Defendant
  Woodstock (City)   Defendant
Before: Decision maker Designation
Stewart, Elizabeth M. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Sherkin, Kevin David   Plaintiff
  Katirai, Shadi   Defendant
  Stieber, Murray   Defendant
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Defendants for an order requiring the Plaintiff to post security for costs in an action brought to challenge the validity of an expropriation. The court ordered that security in the amount of $60,000 be posted. Leave was granted to the parties to make further submissions in relation to the costs of the present application.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2006] EXLAW 18 Ont. S.C.J. 2006-03-24
  [2006] EXLAW 19 Ont. S.C.J. 2006-07-12
  [2007] EXLAW 2 Ont. C.A. 2007-04-20
  [2007] EXLAW 7 Ont. C.A. 2007-06-26
  Later
  [2014] EXLAW 7 Ont. S.C.J. 2014-04-30
  [2014] EXLAW 26 Ont. C.A. 2014-12-08
  [2015] EXLAW 40 S.C.C. 2015-05-21
  [2016] EXLAW 28 Ont. M.B. 2016-10-06
  [2016] EXLAW 48 Ont. M.B. 2016-11-25
  [2017] EXLAW 44 Ont. M.B. 2017-01-03
  [2017] EXLAW 3 Ont. M.B. 2017-05-05
  [2019] EXLAW 23 Ont. L.P.A.T. 2019-09-13
  [2019] EXLAW 26 Ont. L.P.A.T. 2019-10-22
  [2020] EXLAW 1 Ont. L.P.A.T. 2020-02-21
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [2009] EXLAW 3
Parallel citations: (2009) 174 A.C.W.S. (3d) 663
  (2009) 96 L.C.R. 72
  [2009] O.J. No. 234
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024