| Case name: |
Sutherland v. Langley (Township) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Sutherland, Gay Ann |
|
Petitioner |
| |
Building Inspector, Township of Langley |
|
Respondent |
| |
Langley (Township) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Lowry, Peter D. |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Alexander, L. John |
|
Petitioner |
| |
Bennett, Daniel R. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by an owner for a declaration that a transfer of land to the Respondent pursuant to an agreement authorized by s. 3 of the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125, constituted an expropriation for purposes of the grandfathering provisions found in the Municipal Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, s. 912(1). It was held that a s. 3 agreement did not amount to an expropriation for this purpose. The application was dismissed and costs were awarded to the Respondent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1997] EXLAW 237 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1997) 72 A.C.W.S. (3d) 698 |
| |
[1997] B.C.J. No. 1716 |
| |
(1997) 61 L.C.R. 242 |
| |
(1997) 39 M.P.L.R. (2d) 277 |
|
|
|
