| Case name: |
Sutherland v. Langley (Township) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Sutherland, Gay Ann |
|
Appellant |
| |
Building Inspector, Township of Langley |
|
Respondent |
| |
Langley (Township) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Huddart, Carole Mahood |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Alexander, L. John |
|
Appellant |
| |
Bennett, Daniel R. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by an owner for an order staying proceedings by the Respondent to enforce the setback provisions of a municipal by-law pending determination of an appeal. The appeal itself was from a lower court determination that an agreement made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125, s. 3, did not constitute an expropriation for purposes of the grandfathering provision found in the Municipal Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 323, s. 912. The application for a stay was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1998] EXLAW 259 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1998) 78 A.C.W.S. (3d) 508 |
| |
[1998] B.C.J. No. 674 |
| |
1998 Can LII 5658 |
| |
1998 CarswellBC 646 |
| |
(1998) 64 L.C.R. 1 |
|
|
|
