| Case name: |
Bambrough v. Ontario (Minister of Housing) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Ontario |
|
| Court: |
Supreme Court - High Court of Justice - Divisional Court |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Bambrough, Roy Oswald |
|
Applicant |
| |
Bambrough, Sheilah Margaret |
|
Applicant |
| |
Forster, Larry |
|
Respondent |
| |
Ontario (Minister of Housing) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Houlden, Lloyd William |
J. |
| |
Van Camp, Mabel Margaret |
J. |
| |
Wells, Dalton Courtwright |
C.J.H.C. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Ronson, James A. |
|
Applicant |
| |
Grant, Brock |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by property owners for an order directing the Respondent expropriating authority to deliver an appraisal report to the owners pursuant to the requirements of the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1970, c. 154. It was held that the document that was served on the owners by the Respondent in support of an offer of compensation was not an appraisal report as contemplated by the Act. An order was granted directing the Respondent to deliver a proper appraisal report. Costs were awarded to the owners on a solicitor and client basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1974] EXLAW 5 |
|
|
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1974) 7 LCR 103 |
| |
[1974] OJ No. 2072 |
| |
(1974) 5 OR (2d) 386 |
|
|
|
|
|
