link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1205
Case name: W.J. Ellis Co. Ltd. v. Kamloops (City)
Date: 1984-08-03
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Arbitration proceeding
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Edwardson, Mary Linda   Claimant
  Loehr, Joan Patricia   Claimant
  Piper, James Edward   Claimant
  W.J. Ellis Company Limited   Claimant
  Kamloops (City)   Authority
Decision makers: Name Designation
Cassady, George P. Arbitrator
  Ladner, Hugh G. Arbitrator
  Wilson, J. Galt Arbitrator
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Burke, Reinhard   Claimant
  Blair, Richard M.L.   Authority
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Reconsideration by a panel of arbitrators of several aspects of a compensation award made pursuant to the Municipal Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 290. The Claimants had successfully obtained a court order directing the arbitrators to reconsider whether they had erred in determining market value and in refusing to award compensation for interest costs incurred on funds borrowed to assist in relocation. Full taking of four parcels of land located in the City of Kamloops. On reconsideration the arbitrators concluded that no changes were required to their previous award. Costs were awarded to the Claimants.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1984] EXLAW 9
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations: (1984) 32 LCR 158
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1981] EXLAW 17 B.C. S.C. 1981-08-17
  [1984] EXLAW 7 B.C. Arb. 1984-02-15
  [1984] EXLAW 8 B.C. S.C. 1984-05-12
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2026 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024