link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Access Property Services

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1060
Case name: Caine v. Surrey (District)
Date: 1920-04-06
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Cotton, Arthur F.   Appellant
  Surrey (District)   Appellant
  Caine, George S.   Respondent
  Stevenson   Other
Decision makers: Name Designation
Macdonald, James Alexander C.J.A.
  Martin, Archer Evans Stringer J.A.
  McPhillips, Albert Edward J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  McQuarrie, W.G.   Appellant
  Tupper, Sir Charles Hibbert   Appellant
  Taylor, Sidney S.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the District of Surrey from an order whereby the Respondent was granted an injunction restraining the District from resuming land for road purposes. The District had adopted a by-law pursuant to the Municipal Act, S.B.C. 1914, c. 52, that purported to authorize resumption of a portion of the Respondent's land. However, it was held that the Act did not permit a municipal government to resume land in use as a garden. The portion of the Respondent's property in question was in use as a garden and the exemption applied. The appeal was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1920] EXLAW 3
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations: [1920] BCJ No. 86
  (1920) 28 BCR 321
  [1920] 2 WWR 681
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1918] EXLAW 3 B.C. S.C. 1918-12-05
  [1919] EXLAW 2 B.C. S.C. 1919-03-10
  Later
  [1920] EXLAW 4 S.C.C. 1920-11-02
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2025 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024