link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1018
Case name: Associated Building Credits Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)
Date: 2005-09-21
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Associated Building Credits Ltd.   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Transportation and Highways)   Authority
Before: Decision maker Designation
Delves, Diane M. Member
  Dossa, Firoz R. Member
  Linsley, Martin A. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  McDaniel, R. Brian   Claimant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Orr, Robert Valuator Claimant
  Crosson, Richard F. Valuator Authority
  Osland, David T. Appraiser Authority
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimant to the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board for determination of compensation pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. Partial taking of a 2.46 ac. portion of a 9.09 ac. parcel. The land was required for purposes of a highway interchange on the Trans Canada highway near the City of Victoria. The parties had agreed on the claims for market value and injurious affection prior to commencement of the hearing. The Board was required to consider various disturbance damage claims for financial losses and expenses totalling $28,276,361.67. The largest disturbance damage claim ($27,579,073.00) arose from an alleged loss of use of the subject property for a period of seven years prior to the taking. This claim was dismissed. Additional claims for development costs thrown away were allowed in the amount of $20,378.71. Costs were awarded in part. Interest was also awarded.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2000] EXLAW 309 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-04-11
  Later
  [2007] EXLAW 312 B.C. C.A. 2007-11-13
  [2008] EXLAW 21 S.C.C. 2008-03-20
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [2005] EXLAW 313
Parallel citations: (2005) 88 L.C.R. 1
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024