link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 504
Case name: Eckervogt v. British Columbia (Minister of Employment and Investment)
Date: 2002-12-10
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Eckervogt, Heinz   Appellant
  T.D. Oilfield Services Ltd.   Appellant
  British Columbia (Expropriation Compensation Board)   Applicant
  British Columbia (Minister of Employment and Investment)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Smith, Kenneth J. J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Lunny, David   Appellant
  Underhill, Mark Glyn   Applicant
  Crowhurst, Frances   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application to the Court of Appeal by the Expropriation Compensation Board for an order adding the Board as a respondent or, in the alternative, as an intervener, in an appeal from an earlier Board decision. The appeal had been filed by the Claimant in the compensation proceeding and the Authority had chosen not to oppose the appeal. The Board's application was dismissed.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1997] EXLAW 242 B.C. Arb. 1997-05-19
  [1997] EXLAW 1 B.C. Arb. 1997-09-10
  [1997] EXLAW 2 B.C. Arb. 1997-10-16
  [1998] EXLAW 280 B.C. S.C. 1998-06-24
  [2001] EXLAW 338 B.C. E.C.B. 2001-11-26
  Later
  [2003] EXLAW 310 B.C. C.A. 2003-02-13
  [2003] EXLAW 309 B.C. E.C.B. 2003-03-21
  [2004] EXLAW 306 B.C. C.A. 2004-07-20
Neutral citation: 2002 BCCA 675
ExLaw citation: [2002] EXLAW 335
Parallel citations: (2002) 120 A.C.W.S. (3d) 989
  (2002) 176 B.C.A.C. 57
  [2002] B.C.J. No. 2755
  (2002) 8 B.C.L.R. (4th) 63
  (2002) 79 L.C.R. 22
  (2002) 290 W.A.C. 57
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024