link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 455
Case name: Eckervogt v. British Columbia (Minister of Employment and Investment)
Date: 2001-11-26
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  D & B Oilfield Contracting Ltd.   Claimant
  Eckervogt, Heinz   Claimant
  T.D. Oilfield Services Ltd.   Claimant
  Yates, Walter   Claimant
  British Columbia (Minister of Employment and Investment)   Authority
Before: Decision maker Designation
Eames, Lesley Member
  Greenwood, Julian K. Member
  Walls, Sharon I. Vice-Chair
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Jackson, Stephen B.   Claimant
  Preston, Timothy S.   Claimant
  Schuck, Andrew P.   Claimant
  Hincks, Alan V.W.   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Clarkson, Randy Engineer Claimant
  McGillivray, Michael Accountant Claimant
  Milner, Michael Geologist Claimant
  Morison, Stephen Geologist Claimant
  Symes, Toby McLean Valuator Claimant
  Crosson, Richard F. Valuator Authority
  Hodos, Ellen F. Geologist Authority
  Hodos, James Geologist Authority
  Levson, Victor Geologist Authority
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Compensation award by the Expropriation Compensation Board pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125 for the constructive expropriation of three placer gold mining leases. The mining leases were effectively expropriated as a result of a provincial order in council establishing a provincial park. An award was made to the Claimant Eckervogt in the amount of $110,000 for market value of the mining leases. After deduction of the advance payment of $100,000, Eckervogt's net award was $10,000. An award was made to the Claimant T.D. in the amount of $75,000 for disturbance damages. However, the Authority had made an advance payment of $250,000 so the Board certified the overpayment of $175,000 as a debt due from T.D. to the Authority. An award was made to the Claimant Yates in the amount of $20,000 for disturbance damages. Yates had not received an advance payment so his net award was $20,000. The issue of interest and costs was adjourned for determination at a later date.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1997] EXLAW 242 B.C. Arb. 1997-05-19
  [1997] EXLAW 1 B.C. Arb. 1997-09-10
  [1997] EXLAW 2 B.C. Arb. 1997-10-16
  [1998] EXLAW 280 B.C. S.C. 1998-06-24
  Later
  [2002] EXLAW 335 B.C. C.A. 2002-12-10
  [2003] EXLAW 310 B.C. C.A. 2003-02-13
  [2003] EXLAW 309 B.C. E.C.B. 2003-03-21
  [2004] EXLAW 306 B.C. C.A. 2004-07-20
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [2001] EXLAW 338
Parallel citations: (2001) 75 L.C.R. 161
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024