link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases

Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Free Case Law

[Back]	DECISION DIGEST
Record no. 2085

Case name:

Balisky v. Canada (Minister of National Resources)

Date:

2004-03-24

Jurisdiction:

Canada - Federal

Court:

Federal Court of Appeal

Release registry:

[Subscribers only]

Court file:

[Subscribers only]

Order no.:

[Subscribers only]

Parties:	Name	Appearing as
	Balisky, Marcia	Appellant
	Balisky, Terrance	Appellant
	Bev Collins Holdings Ltd.	Appellant
	Bue, Byron	Appellant
	Bue, Raymond	Appellant
	Eggers, Levke	Appellant
	Eggers, Peter	Appellant
	Ellingson, Bryan	Appellant
	Evaskevich, Charles	Appellant
	Evaskevich, Nora	Appellant
	Fast, Brian Peter	Appellant
	Fast, Theresa Georgina	Appellant
	Gabert, Doug	Appellant
	Gilkyson, Raymond	Appellant
	Gilkyson, Vicki	Appellant
	Glasman, Elaine	Appellant
	Glasman, James	Appellant
	Hanson, Laura	Appellant
	Hanson, Stirling	Appellant
	Haughian, Glenda	Appellant
	Jones, Fern	Appellant
	Jones, Roger	Appellant
	Liland, Donald	Appellant
	Liland, Linda	Appellant
	Marouelli, Jamie	Appellant
	Marouelli, Mario	Appellant
	Meador, Donald	Appellant
	Middleton, Mona	Appellant
	Moe, Brian	Appellant
	Moe, Janice	Appellant
	Moe, Kristin	Appellant
	Moe, Randy	Appellant
	Moller, Franklin	Appellant
	Olley, Katherine	Appellant
	Olley, Lloyd E.	Appellant
	Pederson, Don	Appellant
	Piper, Kane Burl	Appellant
	Richards, Ada	Appellant
	Richards, Robert	Appellant
	Schmidt, Cornie	Appellant
	Schmidt, Priscilla	Appellant
	Slater, Albert	Appellant
	Slater, Kenneth	Appellant
	Smith, Dale	Appellant
	Smith, Gwen	Appellant
	Strate, Gordon	Appellant
	Thederahn, Frank	Appellant
	Thederahn, Irma	Appellant
	Welsh, Ed	Appellant
	Alliance Pipeline Ltd.	Respondent
	Canada (Minister of Natural Resources)	Respondent

Before:	Decision maker	Designation
	Stinson, Charles E.	Assessment Officer

Lawyers:	Name	Appearing for
	Carter, J. Darryl	Appellant
	Olthafer, Lars H.O.	Respondent
	Rosenberg, Morris	Respondent

Experts:

Taking type:

[Subscribers only]

Valuation date:

[Subscribers only]

Case elements:

[Subscribers only]

Decision:

Assessment of costs payable by the Respondents following a successful appeal. The Appellants presented two bills of costs one for each Respondent each in the amount of $7,823.57. The court awarded $1,818.28 respectively against each of the two Respondents.

Comment:

[Subscribers only]

Statute references:

[Subscribers only]

Case references:

[Subscribers only]

Related decisions:
	Earlier
	[2002] EXLAW 16	F.C. T.D.	2002-09-13
	[2003] EXLAW 24	F.C. A.D.	2003-02-27
	[2003] EXLAW 25	S.C.C.	2003-11-27
	Later
	[2008] EXLAW 17	F.C.	2008-09-26
	[2011] EXLAW 35	FED NEB	2011-11-25
	[2012] EXLAW 35	FED NEB	2012-06-15

Neutral citation:

2004 FCA 123

ExLaw citation:

[2004] EXLAW 32

Parallel citations:	(2004) 169 A.C.W.S. (3d) 714
	[2004] F.C.J. No. 536

Reasons:

[Subscribers only]

Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.

Online Subscription Service