| Case name: |
Tidmarsh v. Comox-Strathcona (Regional District) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Tidmarsh, Mark David |
|
Appellant |
| |
British Columbia (Expropriation Compensation Board) |
|
Respondent |
| |
Comox-Strathcona (Regional District) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Shaw, Duncan W. |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Melville, J. Bruce |
|
Appellant |
| |
Yardley, James Gregory |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal by a property owner from a decision of the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board made pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. The Board had disallowed a claim for interest charged on legal accounts incurred by the Appellant. The court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter back to the Board for determination. Costs of the appeal were awarded to the Appellant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1995] EXLAW 93 |
|
|
|
| Parallel citations: |
(1995) 54 ACWS (3d) 696 |
| |
[1995] BCJ No. 1040 |
| |
1995 CarswellBC 2507 |
| |
(1995) 55 LCR 81 |
|
|
|
|
|
