link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 410
Case name: Ficht v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
Date: 1969-01-22
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Ficht, Gladys Elizabeth   Claimant
  Ficht, Joseph Paul   Claimant
  British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority   Authority
Decision makers: Name Designation
Provenzano, Michelangelo Co. Ct. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Gibbs, D.J.   Authority
  McConnell, Benjamin J.   Authority
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Cornock, Sydney H. Appraiser Claimant
  Salt, George William Real Estate Agent Claimant
  Grant, Ronald Douglas Appraiser Authority
  Williamson, Keith Irvine Appraiser Other
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the Claimants from the finding of a valuator appointed pursuant to the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority Act, 1964, S.B.C. 1964, c. 7. Full taking of four parcels of land located near the Arrow Lakes. The land was taken by the Authority to permit construction of a water storage reservoir. The valuator had awarded $35,376.00 in compensation. The Authority had previously made an advance payment of $30,000.00. The appeal was dismissed and the Authority was ordered to pay the additional compensation awarded by the valuator. Interest was also awarded on the compensation. Costs were awarded to the Authority.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1969] EXLAW 307
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations:  
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1970] EXLAW 302 B.C. C.A. 1970-06-10
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2025 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024