| Case name: |
Bollana v. Surrey (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
| Court: |
Expropriation Compensation Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Bollana, Theresa |
|
Claimant |
| |
Surrey (City) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Shorthouse, Robert W.C. |
Chair |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Woodward, Michael C. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Capuccinello, I. Anthony |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Hooker, Dale C. |
Appraiser |
Claimant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Applications by the Authority for an order adjourning the compensation hearing, an order requiring delivery of particulars, an order requiring delivery of a list of documents and an order for costs in favour of the Authority. Orders requiring delivery of particulars and a list of documents were granted. The adjournment and the order for costs was denied. The Board also observed that it has no jurisdiction to make an order for costs in favour of an Authority in these circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1999] EXLAW 306 |
|
|
|
|
|
