link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 304
Case name: Ocean Port Hotel Ltd. v. British Columbia (Liquor Control)
Date: 1999-07-21
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Ocean Port Hotel Limited   Appellant
  British Columbia (Liquor Control)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Ryan, Catherine Anne J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Frey, Michael W.W.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application for stay of a decision of the Court of Appeal pending appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court's earlier decision resulted from the appeal of an administrative tribunal's decision in relation to the suspension of a liquor license. That decision had set aside the suspension on grounds that the tribunal lacked independence. The applicant alleged that the earlier decision would not only seriously interfere with operation of the liquor regulation scheme but it also called into question the independence of a number of other tribunals such as the Expropriation Compensation Board established under the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 125. The applicant sought an order that would preserve the functions of all similar tribunals established under British Columbia legislation.

The court acknowledged that its earlier decision might be used to challenge decisions of other tribunals. However, it observed that those decisions would remain valid until set aside by an order of a competent tribunal. The court suggested that the Attorney General could apply for an order declaring temporary validation of the other tribunals affected but it declined to make such an order on the present application. However, a stay was granted in relation to the judgment under appeal.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1999] EXLAW 304
Neutral citation: 1999 BCCA 468
Parallel citations: (1999) 19 ADMIN LR (3d) 169
  (1999) 128 BCAC 130
  [1999] BCJ No. 1888
  (1999) 208 WAC 130
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [2000] EXLAW 310 B.C. E.C.B. 2000-03-31
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024