| Case name: |
Isitt v. Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co. |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Isitt, Francis A.G. |
|
Appellant |
| |
Isitt, Gertrude |
|
Appellant |
| |
Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Company |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Eberts, David MacEwan |
J.A. |
| |
Macdonald, James Alexander |
C.J.A. |
| |
Martin, Archer Evans Stringer |
J.A. |
| |
McPhillips, Albert Edward |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Bull, Alfred |
|
Appellant |
| |
Tupper, Sir Charles Hibbert |
|
Appellant |
| |
MacNeill, Albert Howard |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal by property owners from a trial judgment awarding compensation in the amount of $755.30 for the taking of gravel from the Appellants' land for use on the Respondent's railway. The Respondent had a statutory power to take gravel from the Appellants' land pursuant to the Railway Act, R.S.C. 1906, c. 37, but did not follow the statutory procedure in this case. The Appellants sought an increased award of damages. The appeal was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[1918] EXLAW 6 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[1918] B.C.J. No. 180 |
| |
(1918) 26 B.C.R. 90 |
| |
1918 Can LII 675 |
| |
1918 CarswellBC 86 |
| |
[1918] 3 W.W.R. 500 |
|
|
|
