| Case name: |
Morasiewicz v. Niagara (Regional Municipality) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Ontario |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Morasiewicz, Kathleen Georgina |
|
Claimant |
| |
Niagara (Regional Municipality) |
|
Respondent |
|
| Decision makers: |
Name |
Designation |
|
Zuidema, Jyoti V. |
Vice-Chair |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Rudolph, Manfred |
|
Claimant |
| |
DeMelo, Paul M. |
|
Respondent |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Dragicevic, Robert |
Planner |
Claimant |
| |
Kennedy, James |
Real Estate Consultant |
Claimant |
| |
Ker, Kevin |
Agrologist |
Claimant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application by an owner to the Ontario Municipal Board for an order determining the amount of compensation payable by the Respondent expropriating authority following an expropriation conducted pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26. The subject property had been used as the Claimant's personal residence. The entire parcel was taken for highway purposes. Prior to the hearing the parties reached agreement on the market value of the land taken. The Board considered several claims for disturbance damage for which compensation was awarded. The remaining claims were dismissed. Interest was also awarded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2010] EXLAW 34 |
|
|
|
| Parallel citations: |
2010 CarswellOnt 8191 |
| |
(2010) 101 LCR 222 |
| |
[2010] OMBD 840 |
|
|
|
|
|
