Expropriation Law Centre

Cases

 
You are here: Home > Cases
Menu

Advertisement

Cohen Highley LLP

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1591
Case name: Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Co. v. Milsted
Date: 1907-09-27
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Registry: [Subscribers only]
File: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Milsted, Hannah Mary   Claimant
  Vancouver, Victoria and Eastern Railway and Navigation Company   Authority
Before: Decision maker Title
Clement, William Henry Pope J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Brydone-Jack, Arthur C.   Claimant
  Reid, Robie L.   Authority
Experts:  
Taking type/date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by an owner from an award of costs to the railway company pursuant to the Railway Act, S.C. 1903, c. 58. It was held that the costs of obtaining a warrant for possession should be borne by the Claimant.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1908] EXLAW 3 B.C. S.C.F.C. 1908-01-17
Neutral citation:  
ExLaw citation: [1907] EXLAW 1
Parallel citations: [1907] B.C.J. No. 33
  (1907) 13 B.C.R. 187
  (1907) 7 Can.Ry.Cas. 257
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:

Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 
Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement