link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Expropriation Law Centre

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1321
Case name: WMI Waste Management of Canada Inc. v. Edmonton (City)
Date: 1996-02-15
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Court of Appeal
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  WMI Waste Management of Canada Inc.   Appellant
  Edmonton (City)   Respondent
Decision makers: Name Designation
Belzil, Roger Hector J.A.
  O'Leary, Willis E. J.A.
  Picard, Ellen I. J.A.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Zalmanowitz, Barry   Appellant
  Douglas, M.   Respondent
  Lopushinsky, Darrell G.   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal from a lower court order dismissing an action seeking to set aside a municipal bylaw enacted by the Respondent. In 1995 the Respondent amended its Solid Waste By-law. The effect of the amendment was to give the Respondent responsibility for collection and disposal of all solid waste from multi-family residential units in the City of Edmonton. The Appellant had previously conducted a business collecting solid waste from the same residential units. The by-law amendment caused the Appellant's customers to terminate their contracts for solid waste pickup. The Appellant alleged that the by-law amendment had constructively expropriated its business. It was held that the actions of the Respondent did not amount to an expropriation. The appeal was dismissed with costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1996] EXLAW 13
Neutral citation: 1996 ABCA 88
Parallel citations: (1996) 61 ACWS (3d) 188
  [1996] AJ No. 137
  (1996) 178 AR 384
  1996 CarswellAlta 130
  (1996) 58 LCR 165
  (1996) 31 MPLR (2d) 251
  (1996) 110 WAC 384
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2026 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024