link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu
Home
News
Events
Statutes
Cases
Articles
Reviews
Photos
Statistics
Publications
Professional Directory
Links

Advertisement

Cohen Highley LLP

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 1207
Case name: Damka Lumber & Development Ltd. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)
Date: 1990-01-11
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: Federal Court - Trial Division
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Damka Lumber & Development Ltd.   Plaintiff
  Canada (Minister of National Revenue)   Defendant
Decision makers: Name Designation
Martin, Leonard J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Bennett, Daniel R.   Plaintiff
  Watchuk, Jeanne   Plaintiff
  Mah, William   Defendant
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the taxpayer from a ruling by the Minister of National Revenue. In 1981, the Plaintiff had sold property located in the District of Coquitlam to the Urban Transit Authority of British Columbia. The Minister had refused to allow the Plaintiff to obtain the benefit of the replacement property rules found in s. 44 of the Income Tax Act, S.C. 1970-72, c. 63. These rules provide for a roll-over in certain cases involving forced dispositions of property. No formal expropriation of the subject property had taken place but the Plaintiff alleged that a notice of intention to expropriate had been provided by the purchaser such that the replacement property rules were applicable. It was held that no notice of intention had been provided and the replacement property rules were not applicable. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the Minister.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
ExLaw citation: [1990] EXLAW 7
Neutral citation: N/A
Parallel citations: (1990) 19 ACWS (3d) 318
  1990 CanLII 13483
  1990 CarswellNat 245
  [1990] 1 CTC 127
  (1990) 90 DTC 6101
  [1990] FCJ No. 27
  (1990) 31 FTR 218
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online
Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement



© 2026 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: November 18, 2024