| Case name: |
Brese v. Edmonton (City) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Alberta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Brese, Rita M. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Brese, William G. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Edmonton (City) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Berger, Ronald L. |
J.A. |
| |
Costigan, Peter T. |
J.A. |
| |
Hunt, Constance D. |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Prowse, John C. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Debrinski, Douglas Steven |
|
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Appeal by the Authority from a final cost award by the Alberta Land Compensation Board pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. E-13. Expropriation of part of the Claimants' land located in the City of Edmonton. The land was required for a road project. The Authority alleged that the Board's cost award was contrary to the principle of proportionality. The Claimant had advanced a compensation claim for lost opportunity which the Board denied. Nevertheless, the Board had awarded costs to the Claimant for presentation of this claim. The appeal was dismissed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutral citation: |
2006 ABCA 27 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2006] EXLAW 1 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2006) 147 A.C.W.S. (3d) 816 |
| |
[2006] A.J. No. 55 |
| |
(2006) 93 L.C.R. 200 |
|
|
|
