link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 2455
Case name: Bue v. Alliance Pipeline Ltd.
Date: 2011-10-25
Jurisdiction: Canada - Federal
Court: National Energy Board Pipeline Arbitration Committee
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Bue, Byron   Applicant
  Bue, Raymond   Applicant
  Fast, Brian Peter   Applicant
  Fast, Theresa Georgina   Applicant
  Gilkyson, Florence   Applicant
  Gilkyson, Raymond   Applicant
  Hanson, Laura   Applicant
  Hanson, Stirling   Applicant
  Olley, Katherine   Applicant
  Olley, Lloyd E.   Applicant
  Piper, Kane Burl   Applicant
  Smith, Dale   Applicant
  Smith, Gwen   Applicant
  Alliance Pipeline Ltd.   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
McCartney, Jim P.A.C. Chair
  Perras, Doug P.A.C. Member
  Solomon, Glenn P.A.C. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Carter, J. Darryl   Applicant
  Estep, Laura Kimberley   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Continuation of an arbitration hearing before a Pipeline Arbitration Committee appointed pursuant to the National Energy Board Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-7. In this decision the P.A.C. considered an application by Alliance for an order directing that elections as to the manner of payment submitted by the land owners were of no effect. The application was allowed. The land owners were granted additional time to provide proper notices to Alliance indicating whether and in what form they seek periodic payments. The matter of costs was reserved for future consideration.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [2006] EXLAW 13 F.C. 2006-06-07
  [2011] EXLAW 33 FED NEB 2011-08-25
  Later
  [2012] EXLAW 35 FED NEB 2012-06-15
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [2011] EXLAW 34
Parallel citations:  
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024