| Case name: |
P.W. Lorch & Associates Ltd. v. Saskatchewan |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Saskatchewan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Fox, Thomas |
|
Applicant |
| |
Hoffman, Dave |
|
Applicant |
| |
Hoffman & Associates Ltd. |
|
Applicant |
| |
Saskatchewan |
|
Applicant |
| |
P.W. Lorch & Associates Ltd. |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Ottenbreit, Ralph K. |
J.A. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Bergbusch, Peter Timothy |
|
Applicant |
| |
Morris, Michael James |
|
Applicant |
| |
Ehmann, James Stephen |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Applications for leave to appeal a trial court decision refusing to summarily strike out the statement of claim. The main action sought an award of damages arising out of expropriation proceedings conducted pursuant to The Expropriation Procedure Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. E-16. The Plaintiff (Respondent) had alleged that there was a conspiracy between the Province and its appraisers to suppress the price to be offered to the Respondent property owner. Leave to appeal was refused. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutral citation: |
2012 SKCA 93 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2012] EXLAW 19 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2012) 225 A.C.W.S. (3d) 674 |
| |
(2012) 107 L.C.R. 134 |
| |
[2012] S.J. No. 644 |
| |
(2012) 399 Sask. R. 226 |
| |
(2012) 552 W.A.C. 226 |
|
|
|
