link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 624
Case name: Johnson v. Alberta (Minister of Public Works, Supply and Services)
Date: 2001-07-20
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Court of Queen's Bench
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Bennett, Dennis W.   Plaintiff
  Johnson, Paul W.   Plaintiff
  Johnson, Sheila Ann   Plaintiff
  Johnson, William Walter   Plaintiff
  Rider, Corinne   Plaintiff
  Rider, Thomas   Plaintiff
  Riebel, Alexander F.J.   Plaintiff
  Riebel, Gabriel Richard   Plaintiff
  Riebel, John Peter   Plaintiff
  Sawyer, Sylvia   Plaintiff
  Alberta   Defendant
  Alberta (Minister of Environmental Protection)   Defendant
  Alberta (Minister of Public Works, Supply and Services)   Defendant
Before: Decision maker Designation
Phillips, Carolyn S. J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Berner, Lorenz   Plaintiff
  Peacock, J. Patrick   Plaintiff
  Hurlburt, William H.   Defendant
  McNaughton, Sheila Catherine   Defendant
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  de Rijcke, Izaak Surveyor Plaintiff
  Nichol, Stephen H. Surveyor Plaintiff
  McWilliam, David Surveyor Defendant
  Michaud, Philip Michael Surveyor Defendant
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application for an order determining the nature and extent of title to several parcels of land expropriated by the Province of Alberta for purposes of a water reservoir. The application was necessary to permit the Land Compensation Board to determine compensation in a proceeding conducted pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. E-16, as the Board did not have jurisdiction to perform this task. At issue was the location of the boundaries of the Plaintiffs' properties at the moment of taking. Over a lengthy period of time prior to expropriation the waters of the lake had receded resulting in accretion. The court held that any accretions were limited by the theoretical boundaries of each parcel as established by the land survey system in effect in the province.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1999] EXLAW 4 Alta. L.C.B. 1999-12-21
  Later
  [2001] EXLAW 26 Alta. Q.B. 2001-09-04
  [2001] EXLAW 12 Alta. L.C.B. 2001-11-28
  [2002] EXLAW 8 Alta. Q.B. 2002-12-06
  [2005] EXLAW 1 Alta. C.A. 2005-01-13
  [2005] EXLAW 3 S.C.C. 2005-05-19
  [2007] EXLAW 11 Alta. L.C.B. 2007-06-28
  [2007] EXLAW 30 Alta. L.C.B. 2007-07-16
Neutral citation: 2001 ABQB 642
ExLaw citation: [2001] EXLAW 15
Parallel citations: (2001) 107 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1115
  [2001] A.J. No. 1023
  (2001) 292 A.R. 263
  (2001) 95 Alta. L.R. (3d) 311
  (2001) 203 D.L.R. (4th) 476
  (2001) 74 L.C.R. 253
  (2001) 43 R.P.R. (3d) 249
  [2001] 10 W.W.R. 484
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024