link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Prowse Chowne LLP

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 45
Case name: Casamiro Resource Corp. v. British Columbia
Date: 1993-04-16
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Expropriation Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Casamiro Resource Corporation   Claimant
  Cinta Resource Corp.   Claimant
  Sherwood Mines Ltd. (NPL)   Claimant
  British Columbia   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Clark, David J. Member
  Coates, John A. Member
  Heinrich, John H. Chairman
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Clark, H.C. Ritchie   Claimant
  MacDonald, Gary A.   Claimant
  Nugent, Daniel D.   Claimant
  Hanman, Charles Edward   Respondent
  Pearce, William A.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Carter, N.C. Geologist Claimant
  Glanville, Ross Engineer Claimant
  Heard, R.T. Engineer Claimant
  Barr, David A. Engineer Respondent
  Fisher, Arthur T. Engineer Respondent
  Leader, Robert Engineer Respondent
  Martin, Dennis C. Engineer Respondent
  Mouat, Robert Engineer Respondent
  Norquist, William R. Engineer Respondent
  Wortman Engineer Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimant to the British Columbia Expropriation Compensation Board for determination of compensation pursuant to the Expropriation Act, S.B.C. 1987, c. 23. Constructive expropriation of 19 Crown-granted mineral claims located in Strathcona Provincial Park. The act of expropriation consisted of the adoption of an Order in Council pursuant to the Park Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 309, which effectively prohibited all surface uses. An award of $375,000 was made for market value of the mineral claims plus interest and costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1990] EXLAW 2 B.C. S.C. 1990-04-10
  [1991] EXLAW 131 B.C. C.A. 1991-05-13
  Later
  [1997] EXLAW 240 B.C. C.A. 1997-09-18
  [2000] EXLAW 320 B.C. C.A. 2000-06-28
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1993] EXLAW 45
Parallel citations: 1993 CarswellBC 2736
  (1993) 50 L.C.R. 99
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024