| Case name: |
Ingham v. Creston (Town) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
| Court: |
Expropriation Compensation Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Ingham, Albert Cecil |
|
Claimant |
| |
Ingham, Lillian Rose |
|
Claimant |
| |
Jamieson, Frank Herbert |
|
Claimant |
| |
Jamieson, Mildred Johanna |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Helen |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Russel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Kowalski, Samuel |
|
Claimant |
| |
Creston (Town) |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Walls, Sharon I. |
Vice-Chair |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
McBain, Lisa D. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Melville, J. Bruce |
|
Authority |
|
| Experts: |
Name |
Occupation |
Appearing for |
| |
Grant, Danny R. |
Appraiser |
Claimant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Two final cost reviews heard together. One was to fix the costs of an earlier cost review conducted pursuant to s.45 of the Expropriation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.125. The other was to fix the appraisal costs for the Claimants' participation in the rehearing of a compensation claim. The first set of costs were determined under the actual reasonable costs regime in place prior to June 28, 1999 and the second set were determined under the tariff which took effect on that date. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2001] EXLAW 312 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
(2001) 73 L.C.R. 129 |
|
|
|
