link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases



Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 2708
Case name: Chappell v. Ontario (Minister of Government Services)
Date: 1984-11-19
Jurisdiction: Canada - Ontario
Court: Supreme Court - High Court of Justice - Divisional Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Ontario (Minister of Government Services)   Appellant
  Chappell, Georgina Grace   Respondent
  Chappell, Hyliard Garfield   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Anderson, William Joseph J.
  Reid, Robert Franklin J.
  Steele, Donald Robert J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Hunter, Leith A.   Appellant
  Marshall, Thomas Cameron   Appellant
  Smith, Garry J.   Respondent
  Tzekas, Christopher James   Respondent
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Appeal by the expropriating authority and cross-appeal by the owner from a compensation award made by the Ontario Municipal Board pursuant to the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1980, c. 148. The Board had awarded compensation in the amount of $1,724,725 inclusive of amounts for market value of the land taken and injurious affection to the remainder parcel. The appeal was allowed. The compensation award for market value of the land taken was fixed at $247,980 and the claim for injurious affection was returned to the Board for reconsideration. The cross-appeal was allowed to provide for an award of interest. No costs were awarded.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
  [1983] EXLAW 51 Ont. M.B. 1983-08-12
  Later
  [1986] EXLAW 24 Ont. C.A. 1986-03-11
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1984] EXLAW 29
Parallel citations: (1984) 28 A.C.W.S. (2d) 286
  (1984) 31 L.C.R. 214
  (1984) 12 O.A.C. 297
  [1984] O.J. No. 1426
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024