link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Access Property Services

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 752
Case name: 252792 Alberta Ltd. v. Alberta (Minister of Public Works, Supply and Services)
Date: 1993-09-27
Jurisdiction: Canada - Alberta
Court: Land Compensation Board
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  252792 Alberta Limited   Claimant
  Alberta (Minister of Public Works, Supply and Services)   Respondent
Before: Decision maker Designation
Anderson, Walter A. Member
  Hetherington, T.D. Member
  Scragg, Richard K. Member
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Prowse, John C.   Claimant
  Franklin, Stanley A.   Respondent
Experts: Name Occupation Appearing for
  Badke, Doug Gravel Contractor Claimant
  Gomes, Robert Joseph Planner Claimant
  MacKenzie, Kenneth C. (Kim) Planner Claimant
  Shaske, Edward J. Appraiser Claimant
  Diamond, Rene A. Gravel Contractor Respondent
  Hay, Allister M. Planner Respondent
  Navrady, Alexander Maxwell (Sandy) Appraiser Respondent
  Potter, Kenneth M. Gravel Contractor Respondent
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Application by the Claimants to the Alberta Land Compensation Board for determination of compensation following two expropriations conducted pursuant to the Expropriation Act, R.S.A. 1980, c. E-13. Partial takings of the Claimant's land for purposes of a transportation and utility corridor were required by the Respondent expropriating authority. The takings were accomplished by way of statutory agreements made pursuant to s. 30 of the Act. At the date of taking, the subject property was encumbered by a Provincial Restricted Development Area designation. However, this was ignored for purposes of determining compensation. The Board found that the highest and best use of the land before taking was as a holding property for future urban development. In the interim the land had potential for gravel extraction.

The Board made an award of $1,366,860.00 for the market value of the land taken. In addition it awarded $579,424.00 for the loss of gravel extraction potential. A further award of $76,000 was made for injurious affection to the remaining lands. The award totalled $2,022,284.00 plus interest and costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
  [1993] EXLAW 2 Alta. L.C.B. 1993-12-17
  [1995] EXLAW 12 Alta. C.A. 1995-10-20
  [1996] EXLAW 6 Alta. L.C.B. 1996-06-14
  [1998] EXLAW 16 Alta. C.A. 1998-01-14
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1993] EXLAW 1
Parallel citations: (1993) 51 L.C.R. 186
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024