link to Expropriation Law Centre home page

Cases


Menu

Advertisement

Peterson Stark Scott

Advertisement


Free Case Law
[Back] DECISION DIGEST  
Record no. 703
Case name: Tan v. Eng
Date: 1990-12-20
Jurisdiction: Canada - British Columbia
Court: Supreme Court
Release registry: [Subscribers only]
Court file: [Subscribers only]
Order no.: [Subscribers only]
Parties: Name   Appearing as
  Chin, Mary Ahlay   Plaintiff
  Tan, Mary Ahlay   Plaintiff
  Tan, Swee Cheow   Plaintiff
  Dassuncao, Domingo   Defendant
  Eng, Cecelia   Defendant
  Eng, Ken   Defendant
  Eng, Sairsoong   Defendant
  Lee, Stella   Defendant
  Lee, Stella Siu Mui   Defendant
  Ng, Cecelia   Defendant
  Ng, Cecelia Li Wah   Defendant
  Ng, Sairsoong   Defendant
Before: Decision maker Designation
Boyle, Harry David J.
Lawyers: Name   Appearing for
  Phillips, Glen Allan   Plaintiff
  Guy, David M.   Defendant
  Riecken, Guy Basler   Defendant
Experts:  
Taking type: [Subscribers only]
Valuation date: [Subscribers only]
Case elements: [Subscribers only]
Decision: Action brought by purchaser against vendors and realtors for fraud and misrepresentation. An alternative claim was made against the realtors for breach of fiduciary duty. The plaintiffs had purchased a corner grocery store from the defendants. They were not aware until after the purchase was completed that the City of Burnaby had designated the property for future acquisition and use as a park. The grocery business did not prosper. The Plaintiffs eventually sold the property to the City of Burnaby. They alleged that the vendors and the realtor had a duty to disclose this information to the purchasers. The realtor Lee was held to be liable for breach of fiduciary duty for failing to disclose the City's interest in acquiring the land for park uses. However, no loss was proven and no damages were awarded. The balance of the action was dismissed. The purchasers and the realtor were required to bear their own costs. However, the realtor was ordered to pay the vendor's costs.
Comment: [Subscribers only]
Statute references: [Subscribers only]
Case references: [Subscribers only]
Related decisions:      
  Earlier
 
  Later
 
Neutral citation: N/A
ExLaw citation: [1990] EXLAW 4
Parallel citations: [1990] B.C.J. No. 2840
Reasons: [Subscribers only]
Digests contain original content produced by ExLaw and copyright in this content is held by Dicta Legal Services Ltd. (dba Expropriation Law Centre). Reasons for decision are the text of original decisions released by the court or tribunal and edited for accuracy where required. No copyright is claimed for these materials.
Join the Mailing List
Enter your name and email address below:
Name:

Email:


Subscribe 
Unsubscribe 

Online Subscription
Service
Online Subscription Service sign-up
Online Subscription Service log-in

Advertisement


© 2024 Dicta Legal Services Ltd.
Page last updated: April 21, 2024