| Case name: |
Sutherland v. Canada (Attorney General) |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - Federal |
|
| Court: |
Supreme Court of Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
Canadian Airports Council |
|
Applicant |
| |
Jones, Andrea |
|
Applicant |
| |
Jones, Robin |
|
Applicant |
| |
Livingstone, Brett |
|
Applicant |
| |
Livingstone, Glen |
|
Applicant |
| |
Livingstone, Laura |
|
Applicant |
| |
Livingstone, Lisa |
|
Applicant |
| |
Page, Helen |
|
Applicant |
| |
Canada (Attorney General) |
|
Respondent |
| |
Vancouver International Airport Authority |
|
Respondent |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Gonthier, Charles Doherty |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Jamal, Mahmud |
|
Applicant |
| |
Morgan, Brian G. |
|
Applicant |
| |
Roberts, Darrell W. |
|
Applicant |
| |
Shewfelt, John R. |
|
Applicant |
| |
Borrell, Andrew D. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Carruthers, George C. |
|
Respondent |
| |
Rosenfeld, Glenn |
|
Respondent |
| |
Seckel, Allan P. |
|
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application for leave to intervene in an application for leave to appeal from a judgment for damages in nuisance for noise pollution resulting from the construction and use of a runway at Vancouver International Airport. On this motion the applicant was an umbrella organization representing the interests of 36 non-federal Canadian airport authorities. The court record contains the following note: The application to intervene on the application for leave to appeal, other than asserting the importance to its members of the issues on the merits of the case, which appears from the record, argues grounds supportive of an intervention on the appeal itself if leave is granted. It is therefore dismissed as premature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2002] EXLAW 338 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[2002] SCCA 385 |
|
|
|
