| Case name: |
TFL Forest Ltd. v. British Columbia |
|
|
|
| Jurisdiction: |
Canada - British Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Parties: |
Name |
|
Appearing as |
| |
TFL Forest Ltd. |
|
Claimant |
| |
British Columbia |
|
Authority |
|
| Before: |
Decision maker |
Designation |
|
Powers, Robert E. |
J. |
|
| Lawyers: |
Name |
|
Appearing for |
| |
Stephens, K. Michael |
|
Claimant |
| |
Voith, Peter G. |
|
Claimant |
| |
Pearce, William A. |
|
Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Decision: |
Application for a declaration that the Claimant's interest in a tree farm licence had been constructively expropriated and for a declaration that the Claimant was entitled to compensation. Both declarations were granted. However, the Claimant was entitled to be compensated pursuant to compensation provisions found in the Forest Act rather than the Expropriation Act. The Claimant had sought compensation under the latter statute. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Related decisions: |
|
|
|
| |
Earlier |
| |
| |
Later |
| |
|
| Neutral citation: |
2002 BCSC 180 |
|
| ExLaw citation: |
[2002] EXLAW 304 |
|
| Parallel citations: |
[2002] B.C.J. No. 218 |
| |
(2002) 76 L.C.R. 187 |
| |
(2002) 48 R.P.R. (3d) 132 |
|
|
|
